attachment struggles are a poignant thread throughout the book. How did you learn about the adoption process? How did that compare to your research process for airlines and flights?
I have a number of friends who have adopted children and who were generous enough to speak openly to me about their lives. Some families encounter no significant issues as their adoptive children settle in and grow up, but several of my friends have found it a challenging—although no less rewarding—experience. My time in the police had exposed me to the long-lasting impact of childhood trauma, and I wanted to explore this area. I was particularly struck by one friend’s account of how her daughter, adopted at birth, had asked for a hug for the very first time at the age of ten. Attachment disorder is deep-rooted and long-lasting, and I wanted to write about the impact of this on a relationship.
Researching the aviation side of the book was equally interesting. I based the layout of my fictional aircraft on a combination of real-life planes and quickly fell down a rabbit warren of online resources. Flight attendants are extraordinarily indiscreet on message boards, and there is a surprising amount of information about how to deal with a hostage situation. I spent hours on the brilliant NATS.aero website, where their “Plane Talking” page enables you to listen to air traffic controllers guide a real flight into London Heathrow.
Adam and Mina anchor the majority of the narrative, but there are plenty of other points of view. Did you have a favorite character to write? Did anyone capture your attention more than you expected?
I usually have the most fun writing the “baddies” in my books, and I very much enjoyed those sections in Hostage, but it was Sophia who really came alive for me. I have a particular soft spot for children with big vocabularies and questioning minds, and I loved giving her a voice and agency in the story.
The terrorists in this book come from a wide variety of backgrounds. Do you think that everyone is susceptible to radicalization on some level? What do we miss when we define terrorism narrowly?
Radicalization is manipulation, and all manipulation is based on identifying the target’s weak spots and offering a solution to them. It could be financial security or a roof over someone’s head; it could be a father figure or a friend with a listening ear. Everybody needs something, which means everyone has the potential to be manipulated…
The word “terrorist” immediately makes us think of religious extremists, but a terrorist is someone who uses violence or intimidation in the pursuit of political aims. Such a broad definition encompasses so much more than religion, and although I’ve chosen to highlight environmental extremism in this novel, the cause could have been any one of a number. Throughout 2020, as the COVID-19 pandemic devastated the world, I was horrified by the number of “COVID deniers” I came across on social media. I watched as they blocked people who held opposite views to their own, creating an echo chamber that would strengthen their beliefs. The internet has made it very easy to find one’s tribe.
You point out that fundamentalist activists are rarely sympathetic. When you worked as a protest liaison officer, what strategies were most effective in gaining public sympathy and support for a cause?
No one is without flaws, and few of us have no redeeming features. I was fascinated by the workings of extremists and had a reluctant respect for their passion and single-mindedness. The most successful causes play on the emotions of their targets. Think about the times you’ve given money to a good cause: nine times out of ten, it’s because a photograph, story, or statistic has made its way to your heart. For the organization hoping to secure sympathy, research is the key. They have to know their audience and understand how to push their buttons. A demonstration held by a right-wing organization gathered huge support in an area with high unemployment by sowing the seed that unwanted immigration was responsible. We all have a responsibility, I think, to do our own research and to ensure we are not being swayed by someone else’s agenda.
In general, does your background in police work change the way you write?
Absolutely. I am fascinated by the gray area between good and bad and firmly believe we are all capable of committing terrible crimes if the circumstances were right. I explore this in much of what I write, which means you