man there" - she nodded towards Ekstrom - "has made a number of unverified statements. I haven't yet heard a question."
Giannini looked up. She propped her elbow on the table and leaned her chin on her hand with an interested expression.
Ekstrom lost his train of thought for few seconds.
"Could you please repeat the question?" Judge Iversen said.
"I asked whether... you drove down to Advokat Bjurman's summer cabin in Stallarholmen with the intention of shooting Carl-Magnus Lundin."
"No. You said that you were going to try to bring clarity to how it happened that I drove down to Stallarholmen and shot Carl-Magnus Lundin. That was not a question. It was a general assertion in which you anticipated my answer. I'm not responsible for the assertions you are making."
"Don't quibble. Answer the question."
"No."
Silence.
"No what?"
"No is my answer to the question."
Prosecutor Ekstrom sighed. This was going to be a long day. Salander watched him expectantly.
"It might be best to take this from the beginning," he said. "Were you at the late Advokat Bjurman's summer cabin in Stallarholmen on the afternoon of April 6 this year?"
"Yes."
"How did you get there?"
"I went by shuttle train to Sodertalje and took the Strangnas bus."
"What was your reason for going to Stallarholmen? Had you arranged a meeting there with Carl-Magnus Lundin and his friend Sonny Nieminen?"
"No."
"How was it that they showed up there?"
"You'll have to ask them that."
"I'm asking you."
Salander did not reply.
Judge Iversen cleared his throat. "I presume that Froken Salander is not answering because - purely semantically - you have once again made an assertion," the judge said helpfully.
Giannini suddenly sniggered just loud enough to be heard. She pulled herself together at once and studied her papers again. Ekstrom gave her an irritated glance.
"Why do you think Lundin and Nieminen went to Bjurman's summer cabin?"
"I don't know. I suspect that they went there to commit arson. Lundin had a litre of petrol in a plastic bottle in the saddlebag of his Harley-Davidson."
Ekstrom pursed his lips. "Why did you go to Advokat Bjurman's summer cabin?"
"I was looking for information."
"What sort of information?"
"The information that I suspect Lundin and Nieminen were there to destroy, and which could contribute to clarifying who murdered the bastard."
"Is it your opinion that Advokat Bjurman was a bastard? Is that correctly construed?"
"Yes."
"And why do you think that?"
"He was a sadistic pig, a pervert, and a rapist - and therefore a bastard."
She was quoting the text that had been tattooed on the late Advokat Bjurman's stomach and thus indirectly admitting that she was responsible for it. This affray, however, was not included in the charges against Salander. Bjurman had never filed a report of assault, and it would be impossible now to prove whether he had allowed himself to be tattooed or whether it had been done against his will.
"In other words, you are alleging that your guardian forced himself on you. Can you tell the court when these assaults are supposed to have taken place?"
"They took place on Tuesday, February 18, 2003 and again on Friday, March 7 of the same year."
"You have refused to answer every question asked by the police in their attempts to interview you. Why?"
"I had nothing to say to them."
"I have read the so-called 'autobiography' that your lawyer delivered without warning a few days ago. I must say it is a strange document, and we'll come back to it in more detail later. But in it you claim that Advokat Bjurman allegedly forced you to perform oral sex on the first occasion, and on the second subjected you to an entire night of repeated and consummated rape and severe torture."
Lisbeth did not reply.
"Is that correct?"
"Yes."
"Did you report the rapes to the police?"
"No."
"Why not?"
"The police never listened before when I tried to tell them something. So there seemed no point in reporting anything to them then."
"Did you discuss these assaults with any of your acquaintances? A girlfriend?"
"No."
"Why not?"
"Because it's none of their business."
"Did you try to contact a lawyer?"
"No."
"Did you go to a doctor to be treated for the injuries you claim to have sustained?"
"No."
"And you didn't go to any women's crisis centre either."
"Now you're making an assertion again."
"Excuse me. Did you go to any women's crisis centre?"
"No."
Ekstrom turned to the judge. "I want to make the court aware that the defendant has stated that she was subjected to sexual assaults on two occasions, the second of which should be considered exceptionally severe. The person she claims committed these rapes